Posts Tagged ‘online backup’

« Older Entries
Newer Entries »

TwinStrata’s CEO is Tapped by ESJ for 2011 Cloud Predictions

Tuesday, January 4th, 2011

The Year Ahead in Cloud Computing

The pressure to create a cloud presence will only become stronger in 2011. What IT needs to know to be prepared for Cloud Storage is outlined in an Enterprise Systems Journal (ESJ) article authored by TwinStrata’s CEO and Co-Founder, Nicos Vekiarides.

ESJ approached Nicos for this article because they wanted an inside perspective of the emerging cloud storage market. TwinStrata is a leader in cloud storage enablement solutions to provide companies of any size with iSCSI SAN solutions for offsite data protection, archive, and disaster recovery.

Please take a moment and read the ESJ article: The Year Ahead in Cloud Computing

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment »

TwinStrata 2011 New Year Resolutions and Customer Commitments

Tuesday, December 28th, 2010

 

We hope your holiday was all you wished it would be and that this blog posting finds you well rested, rejuvenated, and still enjoying the cheer and joy of the season. And as you prepare for what’s certain to be a very busy and exciting 2011 in IT, we’d like to unveil a few of TwinStrata’s New Year Resolutions or should we say TwinStrata’s Year-After-Year Resolution Extensions:

1.     We won’t rest on our past laurels

Our 2010 success is in the rear view mirror and although a great foundation to build upon going forward, our future success cannot be attained or exceeded without putting forth the same concerted focus on hard work, dedication, and commitment to your growing business needs. We value your trust and will strive to be your solution in 2011 for offsite data protection and disaster recovery.

2.     We will continue to deliver quality solutions to solve real business problems in offsite data protection/DR

IT challenges are very real – especially for small and medium size businesses – who consider economic uncertainty, keeping pace with technology and access to adequate capital at the top of the list.  Therefore, solutions ought not be complicated to deploy, difficult to use, intrusive to the business, and create vendor lock-in or dependencies. TwinStrata CloudArray, more than any of our competitors, truly “gets” the cloud. It’s not just cheap, offsite storage to us but an convergent ecosystem of fast networks, virtualization, automation and policies, diverse file and operating system environments, and a distributed enterprise infrastructure. CloudArray was designed to seamlessly enable and extend this end-to-end ecosystem to the cloud.

3.     We will continue to listen and stay apprised of our customers’ cloud storage enablement needs

Customer satisfaction is derived from many standpoints – service, support, quality, product capabilities, and reliability to name a few. TwinStrata’s success is a result of listening to our customer’s needs, demonstrating our business and technological agility to meet their needs, and being able to build their growth requirements into our short, medium, and long-term strategies. TwinStrata will always endeavor to work with customers this way to become a trusted advisor and partner enabling them to seamlessly include cloud storage in their plans.

4.      We will continue to stay true to our core CloudArray solution values and avoid “miracle” solutions

Technology usually flops when it claims to be more than it can be/do or even should be. TwinStrata’s value proposition is to provide businesses with innovative, best-in-class iSCSI storage solutions for enterprise-class offsite data protection and disaster recovery. TwinStrata’s core value is to enable businesses of all sizes to adopt cloud storage easily, securely, and economically without business interruption or change. These core values will only continue to advance in 2011.

5.     We will continue to ensure our solution claims match our substantiations

TwinStrata is confident in its CloudArray solution to enable offsite data protection and disaster recovery. Our confidence and our claims really stem from our customers including these proven testimonial areas: 1) Overall peace of mind CloudArray brings to them as a result of the product quality and reliability, 2) Ease and simplicity of deployment and usability, 3) Seamless and secure integration with cloud storage providers, 4) Investment protection from not having to change applications or policies, 5) Immediacy of business and operational results, and 6) Quantifiable savings – time, capex/opex, and resources – delivered by CloudArray.

6.     We will continue to strive to support our customers’ cloud storage goals – tactical and strategic alike

We believe that cloud storage will have a breakout year in 2011. And TwinStrata CloudArray will be leading the way with innovative ways to help businesses plan and justify tactical uses of the cloud for offsite data protection, DR, and other storage initiatives. Additionally, TwinStrata will continue in 2011 to advance how CloudArray can help companies’ today build and implement business continuity strategies that were once financially unattainable to small and medium size business.  

TwinStrata understands that our customers are a vital part of our growth and success. We value your trust in our company, and are committed to working harder to bring you the levels of innovation, quality, reliability, and support you’ve come to expect from TwinStrata to meet your business expectations in 2011.

Thank you and Happy New Year!

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment »

BNMC Relies on TwinStrata CloudArray and Best Practices to Avoid Disastrous Data Loss

Thursday, December 23rd, 2010

 

Customer Success: Critical Business Data Saved

BNMC; a Mass. based strategic information technology (IT) network services company, selected TwinStrata CloudArray® to provide backup services for their clients. A virtual appliance that runs on VMware, CloudArray can be deployed for backup, archive, or disaster recovery/business continuity requirements. Key to effective and rapid data recovery in the event of a site disaster is CloudArray‟s metadata so protecting this critical information is top of mind for system administrators. Eryck Bredy, BNMC President & CTO, has always been an advocate of following best practices and one day, he averted a disaster as a result. You see, Eryck accidentally deleted the CloudArray VM he was working on, rendering it terminal. This VM had 1TB of customer data on it. But Eryck wasn‟t worried. He knew that he could easily recover the data with CloudArray since he did, in fact, follow best practices, and had backed up the CloudArray configuration data. And because there was a full copy of the data in the cloud, he knew CloudArray was imminently recoverable in and of itself. After accidentally deleting the CloudArray VM (CAVM1), Eryck simply imported a new CloudArray VM (CAVM2), reset t he cache, and restored the backup of CAVM1 to CAVM2. That was it. When CAVM2 was powered on, it replayed the metadata and back-filled its cache with the data from the cloud on an as needed basis. Because of the rapid and seamless recovery capabilities of CloudArray, BNMC business interruption was avoided. And since all user data was in the cloud, CAVM2 simply re-enabled access to it without incident.

“Bottom line – unfortunate incidents are going to happen. The important thing is to be ready when they do. Using TwinStrata CloudArray helped us mitigate the effects of losing critical data and enabled us to protect the trust our customers have in BNMC.” – Eryck Bredy, BNMC President & CTO

As widespread adoption of cloud services increases, it‟s comforting to BNMC to know that solutions like CloudArray are in place to help. For Eryck, the combination of CloudArray and BNMC best practices helped avoid a potentially disastrous situation for their clients, the loss of their critical business data.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »

TwinStrata Delivers Newest Version of its Leading CloudArray® Offsite Data Protection and Disaster Recovery Solution

Thursday, December 16th, 2010

 

CloudArray® Version 2.0 is available in both virtual and physical appliance configurations.

The new CloudArray Version 2.0 includes a broad range of updates designed to further enhance the overall operation, reliability, and performance of CloudArray’s robust and proven feature set for offsite data protection, archive, and disaster recovery. Additionally, CloudArray 2.0 expands its reach to include direct integration with Mezeo, Peer1, and Scalitycloud storage platforms, offering customers more choice and flexibility when implementing a cloud storage strategy. Other CloudArray 2.0 enhancements include support for HA clustering, Solaris interoperability, alert and portal improvements and performance improvements to the virtual appliance.

CloudArray V2.0 is available today from TwinStrata and through its network of partners. For more information, visit www.twinstrata.com/cloudarray, email sales@twinstrata.com or call 508-651-0199.  

You can also try CloudArray FREE for 30 days: www.twinstrata.com/cloudarray_evaluation

TwinStrataCloudArray is a proven solution that can significantly reduce capex/opex by enabling companies of all sizes to easily adopt offsite data protection and disaster recovery solutions in minutes without any changes to existing applications or need for new programming or APIs in order to connect with cloud storage providers. TwinStrata provides enterprise-class data protection solutions that are simple, affordable, and secure. These solutions leverage the scalability and efficiency of cloud storage while maintaining the availability, performance, and security of local storage. CloudArray software provides a substantial advantage over traditional off-site storage solutions, with a pay-as-you-go model, unlimited elastic capacity, local performance, in-cloud snapshots, AES256 bit encryption, and on-site, off-site or in-the-cloud access to data.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment »

I Have NOT Lost My Mind — I Have It Backed Up On Tape Somewhere

Monday, December 6th, 2010

 

The question is: If you can eliminate tape, then can you even eliminate backup? In a recent article, George Crump (http://www.networkcomputing.com/deduplication/you-can-eliminate-backups.php) discussed the implications of eliminating backup altogether.  His argument is that with the capabilities of modern storage systems – snapshots, deduplication, compression and replication– you can preserve multiple restore points without the need for a separate backup operation. 

He specifically argues: “Using a combination of snapshots, deduplication, compression and replication is a cost-effective way of storing redundant copies. Many primary storage systems support a high number of snapshots and/or unlimited copies of data by leveraging deduplication. Most can then have that data replicated to a remote site so you are covered for a single site disaster. With these features deployed, we now have point-in-time local recovery and total system recovery in case of a disaster covered, but there are some potential drawbacks.”

Using Cloud Storage as the remote replication target in this case will work very well, and will be more cost effective than using your expensive primary storage devices for backup.  

With CloudArray, you can create instantaneous snapshots of your data, allowing you to establish multiple remote restore points from a single copy of your data.   This doesn’t have to be your primary data store. Cloud Storage can actually become an economical cog in your tiered storage strategy.

But getting back to George’s article, he discusses several drawbacks with using primary storage as your source for your restore points.  Basically, they come down to the risk, however small, of not having a separate copy of your data (both physically and logically).  Even in cases where you are replicating your data to a remote facility, a logical corruption fault could affect both sites, especially if the fault were with the logic of the de-duplication engine itself.

Some companies have eliminated separate backups very successfully, but it takes a great deal of planning in order to make sure that the restore points will be consistent across applications and data stores. It wouldn’t help you to have your accounts payable tables backed up at one point in time and your inventory shipments at a different point. 

But is it right for you? 

Maybe, but a safer approach is to still use backup software and write your backup to a physically separate data store than your primary storage.  CloudArray can do this for you as well.  If you use a backup product that can write to disk (D2D), then you can write to CloudArray and a copy of the backup images will be kept locally as well as in the Cloud.  Restores will always come from the local CloudArray disk cache if you size it properly, and in the event of a total site disruption, a copy of your data will still be housed safely offsite and can be recovered from any site you choose.

Eliminating tape is a good first step. Eliminating backup entirely might be an option for you down the road (or not). Remember the cardinal rule: “To go forward, you must backup.” So you probably shouldn’t be in a rush to eliminate it. But if you have lost your mind because you’ve backed it up on tape somewhere, then without CloudArray, you may never get it back!

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment »

The Real Problem with Tape Storage is Recovery

Monday, November 29th, 2010

Tape storage has been around longer than most people have been working in IT, and it has been the subject of prolonged and brutal attacks by technologies that seek to displace it for most of that time. Yet it continues to thrive. While sales of new tape systems are down (by some measures by as much as 25%), they are not out. 

Businesses continue to rely on tape for its unique role of providing long term archival and replication of data. Tape spans the entire continuum of data centers, from the self maintained racks in a storage closet to multi-million dollar facilities with multi-homed infrastructure and large organizations supporting them. It’s used and accepted up and down the economic ladder and isn’t going to go away any time soon.

So why should you consider an alternative?

There are actually several good reasons to either augment your current use of tape or eliminate it altogether. But it all comes down to recovery. Nobody backs up data thinking they will never need it again. It’s not just an exercise in compliance.

You back up to tape because at some point, you will need to restore data that isn’t recoverable any other way. But in most cases, you will do that restore within 30 days of when you wrote it. That small fact, which ESG confirmed in a recent survey that showed that 95% of all restores are done within 30 days, belies the rationale most people use to write to tape in the first place.

The reason for that is that tape is a terrible medium to use for short term backups. It stretches, it breaks, it has a high error rate per tape, they get lost and a lot of the time and in many cases data can’t be recovered from a tape because it was either never written or because the tape has too many errors. These problems are only going to get worse as tape densities and length increase and as you put multiple TB’s worth of data on each one.

But you still need long term, as in 7-10 years worth, storage requirements for both policy and regulatory compliance issues. You are caught between two competing operational goals and are forced to accept a one solution fits all answer.

Or are you?

The answer lies in your ability to separate short term data recovery and offsite storage needs from long term archival. If you could find a way to keep a near-line copy of your data, you could satisfy your short term recovery needs. If you can retain tape as a long term archival method, even if it is at a reduced retention schedule, you can meet your long term goals and greatly reduce your costs. If you can do both, your operational readiness will increase drastically and your costs will dive.

The good news is that you can do both. By deploying CloudArray along with a tape backup solution, you can meet your short term recovery goals with on-line copies of your backups locally while at the same time keeping copies in the cloud to meet your short term offsite retention requirements, and tape copies in a warehouse to meet your very long term archival requirements.

Most backup products will allow you to keep both a tape and a disk based copy of the same data set. So your basic policy would be to do daily backups to CloudArray, thus preserving your ability to restore data meeting both RPO and RTO objectives, while at the same time running 30 day full backup cycles to tape for long term storage requirements. You can set your CloudArray backups to any schedule you choose, so you can retain daily, weekly, or monthly backups for any amount of time. If you kept daily backups for 60 days, then weekly backups for one year, and monthly backups for two years, the tape copies would never have to be touched inside of that 2 year window. 

It’s the best of both worlds. Do you agree? Visit www.TwinStrata.com for more information and a free 30 day trial.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment »

Data Storage and Protection Strategies for the Cloud Era

Tuesday, November 16th, 2010

For SMBs considering traditional data backup and storage and/or for those struggling with an off-site solution, it may be time to consider the cloud as an alternative data protection solution.

Enterprise Systems Journal article by Nicos Vekiarides

Data protection and storage are substantial budgetary expenses for today’s small-to-midsize businesses (SMBs). With storage capacities increasing every year, businesses must look at leaner alternatives, especially in the face of shrinking IT budgets. For years, larger businesses have relied on remote data centers to protect and store their data, but the administrative effort, reliability concerns, and expense associated with traditional backup methods such as tape or off-site disk make this approach an unrealistic option for smaller organizations.

… to read Nicos’s full ESJ article: http://esj.com/articles/2010/11/16/Storage-and-Protection-Strategies.aspx

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment »

« Older Entries
Newer Entries »